| 土的固结试验快速法与常规法试验结果的对比分析 |
| 投稿时间：2004-06-09 修订日期：2004-06-09 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：罗来芬.土的固结试验快速法与常规法试验结果的对比分析[J].钻探工程,2004,31(10):20-23.LUO Lai-fen. Contrast Analyses between Test Results of Soil Consolidation Fast and Convention Methods[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2004,31(10):20-23. |
| 摘要点击次数: 834 |
| 全文下载次数: 311 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:介绍了土的固结试验快速方法及其数据校正，并结合工程实际对土的固结试验快速法压缩系数a′1-2与常规法压缩系数a1-2进行了对比分析。 |
| 中文关键词:土工试验 固结试验 压缩系数 快速法 常规法 |
| |
| Contrast Analyses between Test Results of Soil Consolidation Fast and Convention Methods |
|
|
| Abstract:The fast method of soil consolidation test and the amending formula for the data of the results were introduced. Contrast analyses between the coefficient of compressibility (a′1-2) of the quick method and the coefficient of compressibility (a1-2) of the common method was made based on project cases. |
| keywords:soil test consolidation test coefficient of compressibility quick method common method |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
