| 锤击法与静压法施工预制桩单桩承载力差异分析 |
| 投稿时间：2008-11-20 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：杨国权,刘海波.锤击法与静压法施工预制桩单桩承载力差异分析[J].钻探工程,2009,36(3):53-56.YANG Guo-quan,LIU Hai-bo. Analysis on the Difference of Prefabricated Single Pile Bearing Capacity between Construction by Hammer-driven and Static-pressure[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2009,36(3):53-56. |
| 摘要点击次数: 1416 |
| 全文下载次数: 1215 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:目前国内的各种规范在计算预制桩的承载力时都不考虑打桩方式的影响。但在实际施工中，已经有越来越多的例子表明同样条件下锤击法施工比静压法施工得到的桩基承载力要低。从沉桩机理、挤密作用、孔隙水压力及其消散对施工后强度恢复的影响、土体等方面对2种方法造成的预制桩单桩承载力差异的原因进行了分析。 |
| 中文关键词:粉土 预制桩 承载力 沉桩方式 锤击法 静压法 |
| |
| Analysis on the Difference of Prefabricated Single Pile Bearing Capacity between Construction by Hammer-driven and Static-pressure |
|
|
| Abstract:According to all of the technical standards in China, bearing capacity of prefabricated pile is calculated without taking into account the piling methods. But more and more engineering cases showed that under the same condition, the bearing capacity of pile foundation would be lower by hammer-driven than by static-pressure. The paper analyzed the difference from the soil mass and the effect on strength recovery after construction according to pile-setting mechanism, extruding function, pore pressure and dissipation. |
| keywords:silt prefabricated pile bearing capacity pile-setting method hammer-driven static-pressure |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
