5/25/2025, 11:46:50 PM 星期日
滚石冲击结构物动力响应特征数值模拟研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

成都理工大学环境与土木工程学院,四川 成都 610059

中图分类号:

P694;U412

基金项目:

2020年省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“非开挖钻具综合性能测试装置研发及钻具结构智慧设计”(编号:S202010616065)


Numerical simulation of dynamic response characteristics of structures impacted by rockfalls
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu Sichuan 610059, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在滚石冲击破坏建(构)筑物灾害中,滚石形状往往具有不确定性,建(构)筑物表面形状也不尽相同。当滚石冲击结构物时,由于滚石形状的不同导致其所表现出来的冲击动力响应特征也不同。采用ABAQUS有限元软件中的Explicit动力有限元方法,分别开展不同形状滚石冲击不同表面形状结构物的数值模拟研究,并对不同缓冲层的缓冲耗能特性进行对比分析。结果表明:在质量、初速度相同的初始条件下,形状不同的滚石冲击平面墙状的结构物时,冲击力峰值大小依次为正方体>圆柱体(底面)>圆柱体(侧面)>球体>三棱锥;当滚石冲击面形状由“尖”变“钝”时,结构物受滚石冲击处被破坏程度将变小,但其整体变形区域增大;对不同表面形状的结构物承受滚石冲击时,冲击力峰值大小依次为平面状>凸面状>凹面状>波浪面状>斜面状,相比而言,斜面状结构物具有较好的抗滚石冲击性能;对在结构物前方设置不同缓冲层时对滚石冲击的缓冲耗能特性进行对比分析,得出EPS-砂土复合垫层具有较好的缓冲耗散性能,其在实际的滚石灾害防护工程中具有广阔的应用前景。

    Abstract:

    In the disaster of impact of buildings (structures) by rockfalls, the shape of the rockfall is often uncertain, and the surface shape of buildings (structures) is also different. When a rockfall impacts a structure, its impact dynamic response characteristics are also different due to the different shape of the rockfall. The Explicit dynamic finite element method in ABAQUS finite element software is used to carry out the numerical simulation of the impact of structures with different surface shapes by rockfalls with different shapes, and the cushioning energy dissipation characteristics of different buffer layers are compared and analyzed. The results show that under the initial conditions of the same mass and initial velocity, when rockfalls with different shapes impact flat wall structures, the peak value of impact force becomes from large to small in the order as cube>cylinder (bottom)>cylinder (side)>sphere>triangular pyramid; when the impacting surface shape of the rockfall changes from “sharp” to “blunt”, the damage degree of the structure impacted by the rockfall will decrease, but the overall deformation area will increase; when the structures with different surface shapes are subject to rockfall impact, the peak value of impact force is in the order of plane shape>convex shape>concave shape>wavy shape>inclined shape. The inclined structure has relatively better rockfall impact resistance. Through comparative analysis of the cushioning and energy dissipation characteristics of rockfall impact when different buffer layers are set in front of the structure, it is concluded that the EPS sand composite cushion has good cushioning and dissipation performance, and it has a broad application prospect in the actual rockfall disaster protection engineering.

    参考文献
    [1] 张路青,杨志法,许兵.滚石与滚石灾害[J].工程地质学报,2004(3):225-231.ZHANG Luqing, YANG Zhifa, XU Bing. Rock falls and rock fall hazards[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004(3):225-231.
    [2] 刘洋.滚石冲击棚洞防护结构动力响应及作用机理研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2017.LIU Yang. Dynamic response and interaction mechanism of the rock shed subject to rockfall impact[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2017.
    [3] 何思明,吴永,杨雪莲.滚石坡面冲击回弹规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S1):2793-2798.HE Siming, WU Yong, YANG Xuelian. Study of rock-fall motion on slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008,27(S1):2793-2798.
    [4] 叶四桥,巩尚卿.落石碰撞法向恢复系数的模型试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学,2015,36(4):13-19.YE Siqiao, GONG Shangqing. Research on normal restitution coefficient of rockfall collision by model tests[J]. China Railway Science, 2015,36(4):13-19.
    [5] 黄润秋,刘卫华.基于正交设计的滚石运动特征现场试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(5):882-891.HUANG Runqiu, LIU Weihua. In-situ test study of characteristics of rolling rock blocks based on orthogonal design[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009,28(5):882-891.
    [6] 裴向军,刘洋,王东坡.滚石冲击棚洞砂土垫层耗能缓冲机理研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2016,48(1):15-22.PEI Xiangjun, LIU Yang, WANG Dongpo. Study on the energydissipation of sandy soil cushions on the rock-shed under rockfall impact load[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2016,48(1):15-22.
    [7] 王东坡,何思明,吴永,等.滚石防护棚洞EPS垫层结构缓冲作用研究[J].振动与冲击,2014,33(4):199-203.WANG Dongpo, HE Siming, WU Yong, et al. Cushioning effect of rock sheds with EPS cushion on rock-falls action[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014,33(4):199-203.
    [8] 王东坡,何思明,李新坡,等.冲击荷载下EPS垫层棚洞耗能减震作用研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2012,44(6):102-107.WANG Dongpo, HE Siming, LI Xinpo, et al. Study on the dissipating effects of shed with EPS cushion under impact load[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2012,44(6):102-107.
    [9] 王静峰,赵鹏,袁松,等.复合垫层钢棚洞抵抗落石冲击性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2018,51(S2):7-13.WANG Jingfeng, ZHAO Peng, YUAN Song, et al. Numerical study on impact resistance of steel shed gallery with composite cushion[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018,51(S2):7-13.
    [10] Kishi N., Konno H., Ikeda K. Prototype impact tests on ultimate impact resistance of PC rock-sheds[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2002,27(9):969-985.
    [11] Lambert S., Gotteland P., Nicot F. Experimental study of the impact response of geocells as components of rockfall protection embankments[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009,9(2):459-467.
    [12] Buzzi O., Spadari M., Giacomini A., et al. Experimental testing of rockfall barriers designed for the low range of impact energy[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2013,46(4):701-712.
    [13] Peila D., Oggeri C., Castiglia C. Ground reinforced embankments for rockfall protection: Design and evaluation of full scale tests[J]. Landslides, 2007,4(3):255-265.
    [14] OUYANG Chaojun, LIU Yang, WANG Dongpo, et al. Dynamic analysis of rockfall impacts on geogrid reinforced soil and EPS absorption cushions[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019,23(1):37-45.
    [15] 张晓强.桥隧相连落石防护新型结构动力响应分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2018.ZHANG Xiaoqiang. Dynamic response analysis for a new type of rockfall protection structure with connection of the bridge and the tunnel[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018.
    [16] 胡卸文,梅雪峰,杨瀛,等.落石冲击荷载作用下的桩板拦石墙结构动力响应[J].工程地质学报,2019,27(1):126-136.HU Xiewen, MEI Xuefeng, YANG Ying, et al. Dynamic response of pile-plate rock retaining wall under impact of rockfall[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019,27(1):126-136.
    [17] 王东坡,何思明,李新坡,等.滚石冲击闭孔泡沫铝夹芯板耗能缓冲机理研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2016,48(1):43-49.WANG Dongpo, HE Siming, LI Xinpo, et al. Study on the dissipating effects of aluminum foam sandwich panel under rockfall impact[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2016,48(1):43-49.
    [18] 闫鹏,方秦,张锦华,等.不同典型形状落石冲击砂垫层试验与量纲分析[J].爆炸与冲击,2021,41(7):98-113.YAN Peng, FANG Qin, ZHANG Jinhua, et al. Experimental study of different typical shape falling-rocks impacting on the sand cushion and dimensionless analysis[J]. Journal of Explosion and shock waves, 2021,41(7):98-113.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴东东,温继伟,项天,等.滚石冲击结构物动力响应特征数值模拟研究[J].钻探工程,2021,48(10):95-103.
WU Dongdong, WEN Jiwei, XIANG Tian, et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic response characteristics of structures impacted by rockfalls[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2021,48(10):95-103.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:640
  • 下载次数: 804
  • HTML阅读次数: 445
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-25
  • 最后修改日期:2021-08-28
  • 录用日期:2021-09-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-10-28
  • 出版日期: 2021-10-10
文章二维码